The Route 520 bridge as seen from the Chapel Beach Club on Ocean Avenue in Sea Bright.
By SUE MORGAN
It’s not too much holiday sugar that has Sea Bright and Rumson officials and residents hopped up about a proposed new Route 520 bridge over the Shrewsbury River.
Rather, it’s a statement contained in a Monmouth County Department of Engineering slide show that indicates officials in both towns have endorsed one of five proposals previously presented to replace the nearly 60-year-old drawbridge at an estimated $30 million to $40 million cost.
No official in Sea Bright has ever sanctioned any of five alternatives first presented at a public forum in town in October, 2006, according to both current Mayor Maria Fernandes and her predecessor, Jo-Anne Kalaka-Adams.
Ditto in Rumson, says Mayor John Ekdahl.
“Absolutely not,” Ekdahl tells redbankgreen. “The county has never asked us for our input.”
Although he attended a public forum presented by the county engineer’s office in his community during the fall of 2006, Ekdahl says he has not heard a word from Freehold about the bridge replacement plan since then.
The slide show, bearing a production date of September 8, 2008, was recently emailed as a computer file to the borough at Fernandes’ request. It was displayed to the public by Councilman Brian Kelly during that borough’s Smart Growth workshop on Dec. 18.
No one from the county engineer’s office was present to narrate and field questions, a scenario that county Engineer Joseph Ettore described as unusual and out of the department’s typical protocol.
The slide show, which Fernandes said she requested to see how far along the project is, was presented to the Monmouth County Transportation Advisory Board at that entity’s meeting in September, Ettore said, and was created for that purpose. At that time, the advisory board, which works on a consulting basis with the county’s planning board and answers to the freeholder board, was reviewing ongoing and planned bridge repair projects.
But attendees at Sea Bright’s Smart Growth meeting, including Kalaka-Adams, were surprised and miffed upon reading the sentence printed on one slide indicating that governing bodies in both Rumson and Sea Bright support the county’s use of “Alternate 3.” That option, which calls for rebuilding the bridge just south of its current location, is of the five replacement options briefly described on other slides and initially presented in the October, 2006 forums.
“Alternate 3″ also shows that the new bridge’s anchorage on the Rumson side would be located on the residential street known as “old River Rumson Road” that was once the end of the current Rumson Road. It would also take over a pocket park at the end of the street, which Ekdahl noted is county-owned land.
“I can’t imagine that they would choose that route,” said Ekdahl who did not attend the Smart Growth workshop in Sea Bright. “The pocket park was just constructed by the county.”
On the Sea Bright side, the plan could result in the removal of what’s now a Dunkin’ Donuts and a neighboring Gulf gas station to make way for a ramp.
Fernandes, who was a councilwoman two years ago when Ettore and other presenters showed the five replacement and repair options during the public forum, recalled her initial reaction to the county’s plans.
“I remember us telling them then that we didn’t like any of the five options,” Fernandes told about 25 residents assembled at the Smart Growth meeting.
“It’s misleading,” Kalaka-Adams added during the public portion. She recalled that she opposed the plan because of the possibility of taking the gas station and donut shop by eminent domain.
Ettore said the county has not chosen any of the five alternates first presented and agreed that the slide show, created by an engineering department staffer, should not indicate that either municipality has endorsed any of the five plans first shown.
“Nothing has changed,” Ettore said told redbankgreen. “We’re still looking at the various alternatives. No absolute decision has been made.”
For now, residents of both towns probably won’t see any construction equipment on the Route 520 bridge for at least five years, or “possibly even 10 years,” said Ettore, a point that has also been shared with officials and residents in both towns.
The state Department of Transportation must first complete the reconstruction of the Highlands-Sea Bright Bridge carrying Route 36 over the Shrewsbury River. Once that fixed span is up and running, the county expects to begin replacing the Oceanic Bridge between Rumson and Middletown, a project that takes priority over the Route 520 bridge, Ettore said.
County statistics mentioned in the slide show indicate the Route 520 Bridge opens 4,000 times a year to let vessels with high masts pass safely underneath. Between Memorial Day and Labor Day, it opens about 50 times during the weekdays and about 15 to 20 times during summer weekends. It is also one of Sea Bright’s three emergency evacuation routes.
The County (excuse my language here)sucks at engineering. Lets look at the nightmarish plans they have proposed: Hubbard's bridge in Red Bank, which has everyone crazy about eminent domain, the Oceanic Bridge, and now the bridge into Sea Bright. Not to mention the awful eyesore (by the train tracks/foodtown) turning nightmare they constructed. Yes, the Sea Bright bridge is old & in need of repair, but to throw up another monstrosity of a bridge will be sinful. Thankfully, some of the richest people in the County live on that corner and I am sure will have a huge say in what goes next to their property.
old river road or old rumson road?
I agree RBGirl. Also, don't forget the madness of Red Hill Road in Middletown or the nearly mile long jug handle for Kozloski Road in Freehold. Someone in the county must have some Stavola relatives.
Oh yes, Red Hill Road (again sorry) also sucks. What a nightmare. Thanks for pointing that one out. Kozloski Road is ugly, but I try not to go west of the Parkway if I don't have to, so I haven't been out that way in a long time.
RB Gal…..just to set things straight and I am not defending the County just stating facts:
1. The "awful eyesore (by the train tracks/foodtown)" was created by the State of New Jersey, not the County.
2. The "Hubbard's bridge in Red Bank, which has everyone crazy about eminent domain" is all about a taking of roughly 18" (yes 1.5 feet) from the water to Hubbard Place from the corner house. No real impact on the property owners use of their property. I believe the bigger issue is the lights from the cars travelling westbound since the bridge now has a different angle to it.
Are you nuts!!!
The proposed Hubbards Bridge was designed based upon over ten years of meetings with local officials and residents, gathering their input regarding design and configuration, and revising the plans to meet the desires of the community. The process is a case study of how it should be done!!! The proposed bridge is attractive and the replacement of the piece of crap there now is long over due. If you are going to have no regard for the facts please don't disgrace our town by using "Red Bank" in your By-Line anymore!!!!
So just because I don't agree with the new bridge plan I can't have an opinion? Sorry if I had the County Engineer's office confused with the State DOT, excuse me. I think I will move right out of Red Bank & leave my opinions at the door.
The bridge between Rumson and Locust is in much worse shape than the bridge between Rumson and Sea Bright, but all they do there is patch it every winter. Talks about replacing that bridge have stopped, I believe.
i hope they don't replace that bridge, the bullshit with highlands/seabright bridge was too much and has made me quite cynical. i don't see why they would need to replace it. if it is neccessary i understand, i would just appreciate a little more disclosure as to why we need it, unlike the shady dealings with the highlands/sea bright bridge.