RED BANK: GOVERNMENT REVIEW LAUNCHED
Sworn in by Mayor Pasquale Menna, right, were commission members, standing from left: Nancy Facey-Blackwood, Kate Okeson, Mark Taylor, Mike DuPont and Ben Forest. (Photo by John T. Ward. Click to enlarge.)
By JOHN T. WARD
A study that could result in an historic overhaul of Red Bank governance, and imperil three decades of Democratic party dominance, got underway Tuesday night.
On the agenda of the newly empaneled Red Bank Charter Study Commission were nuts-and-bolts matters: requesting a budget, finding a lawyer and setting a meeting schedule.
On the unofficial agenda: learning to use the microphones.
Kate Okeson addressing resident Stephen Hecht, above. Below, Mike DuPont speaks, flanked by borough Attorney Greg Cannon, left, and Ben Forest. (Photos by John T. Ward. Click to enlarge.)
Member Nancy Facey-Blackwood called the commission “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to study our existing government” and “find the best solution to help Red Bank move forward.”
The nine-month study of the town’s 1908 “charter” – not the Red Bank Charter School, as some commenters have assumed on social media – could lead to a referendum on replacing the town’s borough form of government with one of multiple options.
It also could open the door to non-partisan elections, in which candidates who avoid party machinery have a better chance of making it onto a ballot.
With about 20 family members and borough residents watching, Mayor Pasquale Menna swore in the commission’s members: Blackwood, Mike DuPont, Ben Forest, Kate Okeson and Mark Taylor.
They won their seats in the November 2 election, when voters approved a referendum calling for the study and chose the commission members from 11 candidates.
“We’re in a middle ground,” said Okeson. “We’re not politicians. We’re serving for our residents.”
In its first series of actions, the commission:
• Chose Blackwood as chairperson and Taylor as vice chair. Blackwood also chairs the Environmental Commission; Taylor is a former council member.
• Agreed to request a $50,000 budget from the borough council, with four-fifths of that amount expected to go to legal costs.
• Agreed to seek proposals for the legal work, at a target rate of $150 per hour, for a lawyer to attend meetings, provide guidance and write a final report.
Set Proposed a twice-a-month meeting schedule: the second Thursday and fourth Monday (or fourth Tuesday), at 6:30 p.m. Those days were selected based on the availability of the council chambers. CORRECTION: The meeting dates were incorrectly reported in the original version of this post.
Several commission members expressed hope that in addition to the in-person sessions, the borough would provide a virtual option.
Blackwood said the study would consist of three phases: a review of the existing form of government; a look at other forms; and “taking it on the road” with a series of hearings to solicit public input.
As is standard in meetings in the council chambers, microphone management was an issue. This time, though, the tables were turned, as Menna, sitting in the audience rather than on the dais, called out “we can’t hear” as members spoke without turning on their mics.
That prompted Forest to remind his fellow members to turn on their mics when speaking: his was off as he said this.
The next session was slated for December 22, at 6:30, with approval of resolutions formalizing the above actions expected.
If you value the news coverage provided by redbankgreen, please become a financial supporter for as little as $1 per month. Click here to set your own level of monthly or annual contribution.