A screengrab of Wednesday’s meeting, held via Zoom. (Click to enlarge.)
By JOHN T. WARD
An online public forum held Wednesday night by Red Bank’s Charter Study Commission was brief, as only two residents chimed in.
But more have weighed in by email, according several commission members. And one consistent theme is that residents don’t want an appointed mayor, they said.
The commission is examining the effectiveness of the borough form of government in place in Red Bank since 1908, with the possibility of recommending a change in form that would be up for voter approval in November.
At the same time, voters may be asked to approve a change to nonpartisan elections.
Commission member Kate Okeson said that “one of the things that people are very clear on” in her interactions with residents “is making sure that every person that sits up there [on the council dais] has been put there by the people.”
Commissioner Mike DuPont, a former council member, said he had received “a bunch of phone calls and emails regarding the need to elect – that we have an elected mayor, an elected council. I think that’s been a constant theme.”
Another constant, in emails to the commission and questionnaire responses, said Chairwoman Nancy Facey-Blackwood, has been “about the ability to have changeover in government.”
While the commission “may not be able to control that” by imposing term limits, “it was good to see there was interest in that,” she said.
At the same time, member Ben Forest said he’s heard concerns about the frequency of elections, and suggested the commission explore whether to recommend a change away from the annual schedule.
One of the two participants in the public session, Irving Place resident Dan Riordan, said he’d prefer all offices be on the ballot at the same time.
“I kind of like the idea of the full council going up at once,” he said, “so that if there’s a definite ‘vote the bums out feel,’ you can vote ’em all out at once. And I kind of like the idea of a fresh start, with a whole new group of people, though of course some people win re-election.”
In addition, the election process “takes too much attention away from governing,” he said.
But River Street resident Chris Havens strongly disagreed.
“I think staggered is really important,” he said. “It will allow people to focus on the candidates,” as opposed to slates or a large number of individuals, he said.
According to Facey-Blackwood, the commission will discuss preferred forms of government in June. Commission Attorney Michael Collins will then write a report, which will include the ballot question to be asked. Public sessions and small group meetings will follow to disseminate the report and respond to questions, Blackwood said.
In the interim, at its May 17 meeting, the commission is expected to hear from elected officials in towns utilizing alternative forms of government under consideration. Information about the commission’s work so far can be found its website.
If you value the news coverage provided by redbankgreen, please become a financial supporter for as little as $1 per month. Click here to set your own level of monthly or annual contribution.
